Tuesday, April 23, 2013

Landrieu's Bipartisan Love Affair




Senator Landrieu is a self-proclaimed bi-partisan senator.[1] Personally, I think she claims this in order to appease the voters in her growing Republican state of Louisiana. According to GovTrack’s analysis of bill sponsorship, Landrieu falls in the middle of the Republican/Democrat spectrum when it comes to her stance on issues. She falls more moderate on the spectrum than South Dakota’s own Tim Johnson. I found it interesting considering that South Dakota is as red as a fire truck when it comes to ideology.

After figuring out what a DW nominating score is, I found that Senator Landrieu was ranked number  53 on the list.[2]  The extreme on the liberal side is Senator Feingold from Wisconsin with a -0.597 and the most conservative is Senator Coburn from Oklahoma with a 0.791. Landrieu scored a -0.212 placing her left leaning, but still moderate. Most consider Landrieu to be a “blue-dog” democrat saying she falls into a more moderate category. Her various stances on issues tend to be more moderate with her voting along party lines in regards to major issues, but following her constituents’ conservative preference on subsequent matters.[3]

In looking at the recent bills Landrieu has sponsored, it does seem that she seeks to have bipartisan co-sponsorship. This case rings true in her two most recent sponsored bills:
Both pieces of legislation contained an even 50/50 split of Republican and Democrat sponsorship. However, GovTrack ranked both pieces of legislation having a 1% chance of getting past committee and a 0% chance of becoming law.[5]

Mary Landrieu has continued her bipartisan efforts into an area that she considers herself a champion, small business. Landrieu co-sponsored a Market Place Fairness Act that would require Internet purchases to face the same sales taxes as their brick and mortar counterparts.[6] Landrieu has teamed up in this bipartisan effort to ensure that one of her major interests, small business, is given a fair shake when dancing in the national marketplace.

Outside of bill sponsorship, Landrieu still receives relatively positive ratings from liberal interest groups.  Landrieu scored an 85% with the ADA in 2011 putting her below Representative Richmond, the Democrat House of Representative member from Louisiana who scored a 90 percent. Senator Landrieu’s score although appearing rather high, falls below many of the Democrat senators in the chamber who scored in the 90th percentile. Her relatively low score comes as a result of her yes vote on Senate bill 593; an act that would prohibit the EPA from regulating greenhouse gases. Her no vote on Senate bill 940, a bill that repeals various tax cuts for oil companies that have gross annual receipts of over $1 billion. As well as, her yes vote on House Resolution 3080, a bill establishing a South Korean trade agreement.[7]

When looking at party votes as a whole, Landrieu scored the same as her ADA rating. In 2012, Senator Landrieu voted with the Democrat Party 85.2% of the time.[8] In the most recent gun legislation brought before the Senate, Landrieu voted in favor of the bill  falling in line with the majority of Democrats on the vote. This vote may prove detrimental to Landrieu in her next Louisiana election, a state that touts its gun rights.[9] Landrieu’s counter part Senator David Vitter, a Republican, voted against the legislation claiming that he was a supporter of 2nd amendment rights, as well as, his belief that the measure would only affect law abiding citizens with no effects on criminals. Landrieu responded to these remarks with “shockingly” another pro-business response claiming that the legislation would level the playing field for licensed gun dealers by eliminating the unfair advantage of unlicensed and online dealers. Personally, I think this vote will lead to negative reactions from her Louisiana gun happy constituents. I think they care more about their personal liberties then leveling the business playing field for weapons dealers.

Overall, when looking at Landrieu’s voting and bill sponsorship history it appears that she attempts to appease both her party, in order to not lose her chairmanships, and her constituents in order to retain her job. The moderate rankings in the various surveys and studies are a result of this behavior. It would be interesting to see how her voting would change if she stopped seeking re-election. I have a hunch that we would see her scores turn from being moderate to a stronger liberal leaning on the spectrum.



[1] http://www.landrieu.senate.gov/
[2] http://voteview.com/sen111.htm
[3] http://voteview.com/blog/?p=567
[4] http://www.senate.gov/
[6] http://www.nola.com/politics/index.ssf/2013/02/mary_landrieu_part_of_bipartis.html
[7] http://www.adaction.org/pages/publications/voting-records.php
[8] http://www.thepoliticalguide.com/Profiles/Senate/Louisiana/Mary_Landrieu/VotingStatistics/
[9] http://www.nola.com/politics/index.ssf/2013/04/landrieu_voted_for_extended_ba.html

No comments:

Post a Comment